UFS Explorer Technician

Discussions about SysDev's UFS Explorer and R-Explorer
https://www.ufsexplorer.com/ (professional data recovery software)
https://www.r-explorer.com/ (more simple version of UFS Explorer)
pentium450
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:48 am

Re: UFS Explorer Technician

Post by pentium450 »

Thanks for reply .

Of course, developers have the right to decide whether to provide a DEMO code, which is just a string of numbers.

But please do not base yourself on a moral level and baselessly accuse an applicant of illegal or deceptive behavior.

Obviously you are not qualified. ;)
Iurii
Official Product Rep
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 1:16 pm
Location: Kyiv
Contact:

Re: UFS Explorer Technician

Post by Iurii »

Well pentium450, the technical edition is not publicly available, and to use the Demo version we ask you to provide information about yourself. We also reserve the right not to explain the reason for refusal. Where exactly do you think we should write about this?
pentium450
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:48 am

Re: UFS Explorer Technician

Post by pentium450 »

Iurii wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 7:51 am Well pentium450, the technical edition is not publicly available, and to use the Demo version we ask you to provide information about yourself. We also reserve the right not to explain the reason for refusal. Where exactly do you think we should write about this?
https://www.sysdevlabs.com/request-ufsxt.php
Image

Suggestion:

It is best to write clearly here that only enterprise users can apply and must use the enterprise email for application.

Otherwise, a demo registration code will not be provided and there will be no explanation.

https://www.sysdevlabs.com/contact.php
Image

Are you serious? :lol: :lol:

Love is not felt, only discrimination against individual users. It is recommended to modify the relevant content appropriately.
Last edited by pentium450 on Sat Dec 30, 2023 10:37 am, edited 4 times in total.
Joep
Official Product Rep
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 2:18 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: UFS Explorer Technician

Post by Joep »

pentium450 wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:47 am Thanks for reply .

Of course, developers have the right to decide whether to provide a DEMO code, which is just a string of numbers.

But please do not base yourself on a moral level and baselessly accuse an applicant of illegal or deceptive behavior.
I do this where?
http://www.disktuna.com - video & photo repair & recovery service
Iurii
Official Product Rep
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 1:16 pm
Location: Kyiv
Contact:

Re: UFS Explorer Technician

Post by Iurii »

What's new in version 10.4:

* In disk cleanup tool: added function of erasing 'Host Specific' ATA log pages;
* Fixed bug with support of Dell Equallogic RAID6 metadata (Reed-Solomon code variant);
* In plugins:
- Added 'basic' support of VMFS file system (for single-volume datastores, below 16TB);
- Added support of preview for disk image files and virtual disks on the opened file system;
- Added support of other file systems, supported by UFS Explorer Technician (ZFS, JFS, VxFS, WAFL etc.);
* Disk imager: added option to save 'Host Specific' ATA log pages to SDLSP or directly to SATA physical disk clones;
* On-demand imaging:
- When target image file supports writing of ATA log pages, they are cloned automatically on first use;
- Added a tool for explicit imaging of ATA log pages to the target;
* Reworked 'Drives/Bridges security' tool to support ATA log pages from images or 'on-demand imaging task';
* Added double-click decryption of disks from WD MyBook with JMS561 bridge chip;
- Also added automatic recognition of Span/Stripe multi-disk RAID configurations on decrypted storages;
* LUKS decryption: extended allowed password length to 8K symbols, added support of null-symbols in keys/passwords;
* Fixed crash bug with in the disk imager working in ATA-mode;
* In SDLSP file format: added possibility to store 'Host Specific' ATA log pages;
* Added indication of encryption on disks from WD MyBook (DUO) with JMS561 bridge;
* Fixed issue with support of sparse files created with EXT2/3-style inodes on EXT file system;
* UFS file system: fixed a couple of bugs with processing of directory scan (after 'sparse' deletion).
Post Reply